Around 1950, there was a great leap in the development of computers. But as with all inventions, there still exists a problem – the computers were not able to perform accounting functions.
It was around the time when checks were introduced to the world. People find it useful and practical. The banks, on their part, did not foresee the huge demand for checks. Thus, it became a burden for most to process the increasing number of checks of their clients. Some were even forced to close early and refuse accepting more checks just so they can finish closing their transactions for the day.
To solve this problem, the Bank of America tapped the help of Stanford Research Institute (SRI) to create a facility that would automate bookkeeping for banks. It was not an easy feat. The team over at SRI stumbled upon a number of roadblocks. Checks were done alphabetically so if a new account is to be added, the whole collection needs to be reshuffled. Thus, the alphabetical listing was converted into account numbers wherein a new account can merely be added to the end of the list.
But that’s not all, they need to devise a way wherein discretion of account numbers is kept. Barcodes and the OCR system are not viable candidates for inputting the account numbers to the system since they could be manipulated. In the end, it was decided that the account numbers will be printed via MICR which would then be recognized by a magnetic reader.
For a span of five years, they worked and tested numerous models until finally, the ERMA computer was created. ERMA, short for Electronic Recording Method of Accounting, became the first computer that is able to perform accounting functions. But it was only in 1959 when the first model was distributed to one of the branches of Bank of America. But nevertheless, the ERMA computer was a success. It paved the way for efficient banking and check handling. One ERMA computer could handle 600 checks in a minute. It proved to be so effective that by 1970, the Bank of America became the world’s largest bank because of it.